• Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms& Conditions
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
Marketup
  • Home
  • Stock Market
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investment
  • Home
  • Stock Market
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investment
No Result
View All Result
Marketup
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

Judge rejects Trump offer of DNA sample in Carroll rape defamation case

by admin
February 15, 2023
0
325
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


E. Jean Carroll in the New York State Supreme Court on March, 4, 2020.

Alec Tabak | Tribune News Service | Getty Images

A New York federal judge on Wednesday rejected a conditional offer by former President Donald Trump to provide a DNA sample in a lawsuit accusing him of raping a writer in a Manhattan department store in the 1990s.

Judge Lewis Kaplan said that Trump’s offer, which came after years of litigation in E. Jean Carroll’s suit, was too late, coming after the end of the process for exchanging evidence in a lawsuit.

The judge noted that trial in the case, in which Trump is also alleged to have defamed Carroll when he denied her claim, is set to begin in less than three months.

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

  • Rep. Matt Gaetz won’t be criminally charged in DOJ sex trafficking probe, his lawyer says
  • FEC tells George Santos to name campaign treasurer or face ban on fundraising and spending
  • Judge rejects Trump offer to provide DNA sample in E. Jean Carroll rape defamation case
  • Abortion foes to get National Archives tour, apology after filing suit over clothing ban
  • Watch live: Nikki Haley kicks off 2024 presidential campaign in South Carolina
  • Pressure mounts on Biden to address the nation on shoot down of latest aerial objects
  • Biden taps Fed’s Brainard, Bernstein for top economic jobs as part of White House reshuffle
  • Dianne Feinstein, 89, won’t seek re-election, opening up a California Senate seat in 2024
  • Russian forces have relocated at least 6,000 Ukrainian children to camps since start of war, new report says
  • Appeals court upholds $110,000 contempt fine for Trump in New York attorney general case
  • Biden secures landmark 100th judge, outpacing Trump
  • House GOP asks Fauci and dozens of health officials to testify in investigation into Covid origins
  • Pence will fight subpoena in special counsel probe of Trump’s attempt to overturn 2020 election
  • Op-ed: U.S. inflation and jobs reports show fastest recovery in 30 years under Biden

Kaplan also said that Trump had no justification for making his offer on the condition that Carroll’s lawyers be ordered to turn over a previously undisclosed appendix to a report on male DNA found on a dress she has said she was wearing when Trump allegedly attacked her.

The ruling means that there will be no DNA evidence presented at all in the trial.

Joseph Tacopina, an attorney who recently was hired to represent Trump in the case, declined to comment on the ruling.

Trump until recently had refused to provide a DNA sample.

Kaplan’s order Wednesday speculated that Trump’s “patently untimely request for the appendix reflects either tactical shift or just an afterthought.”

He said that one possible explanation is that Trump’s lawyers originally decided not to raise the demand for the appendix over the past three years because of concerns that Carroll’s lawyers would have “renewed demands for Mr. Trump’s DNA.”

But another possible explanation is that Trump’s lawyers had “a negligent failure to read the report with any care over the entire three-year period and thus the failure to notice the lack of the appendix,” the judge wrote.

“But whatever the explanation, the effort comes too late,” Kaplan wrote.

The judge noted that Carroll would not be entitled now to get a DNA sample from Trump, because the process of exchanging evidence, known as discovery, is completed.

“Her counsel have had plenty of opportunities in both of the two related cases to move to compel Mr. Trump to submit a DNA sample,” Kaplan wrote. “Had they done so, they almost certainly would have gotten it. But Ms. Carroll’s counsel never moved to compel Mr. Trump to submit a DNA sample. They obviously decided to go to trial without it.”

This is breaking news. Check back for updates.



Source link –

Tags: CarrollcasedefamationDNAJudgeofferraperejectssampleTrump
Previous Post

‘If there’s something big happening with a record, there’s most likely a story to be told at radio.’

Next Post

Two lakh agriculture credit societies, fishery-dairy cooperatives to be set up

admin

admin

Next Post
Two lakh agriculture credit societies, fishery-dairy cooperatives to be set up

Two lakh agriculture credit societies, fishery-dairy cooperatives to be set up

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

No Result
View All Result

Categories

  • Business (98)
  • Economy (173)
  • Investment (31)
  • Stock Market (94)

Recent.

Tel Aviv among most expensive business travel destinations

Tel Aviv among most expensive business travel destinations

March 21, 2023
Tens of thousands of jobs at risk after UBS takeover of Credit Suisse

Tens of thousands of jobs at risk after UBS takeover of Credit Suisse

March 21, 2023
What Would Interest Rates Have to Be for Unrealized Losses to Be Zero

What Would Interest Rates Have to Be for Unrealized Losses to Be Zero

March 21, 2023

Marketup

we brings premium business and stock market news on our blog

© 2022 marketup - Premium blog news & stock market marketup

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Stock Market
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investment

© 2022 marketup - Premium blog news & stock market marketup

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In